Choosing
telescopes and binoculars
a
beginner's guide
EVERY
amateur astronomer wants to own a telescope – and the bigger the better.
But for a starting instrument don’t overlook binoculars (see the box),
which are often cheaper and better value than small telescopes, and will
show you many interesting objects.
Other
basics for beginning skywatching include a planisphere (a circular star
chart with a mask that rotates to show the stars on view at any particular
time) and a simple star atlas. Armed with these and a pair of binoculars,
you can learn the basic sky sights with little outlay. And the money will
not be wasted – the binoculars will always be useful, even if you eventually
graduate to a large telescope.
Telescope
basics
There
are two main types of telescope: refractors (the spyglass type) which use
lenses to collect and focus light; and reflectors, which collect light
with a mirror. To choose the right telescope, you need to know the relative
advantages of each type.
Telescopes
are judged by not their magnification but their aperture, i.e. the diameter
of the main lens or mirror. When astronomers refer to a 'small' telescope
they mean one with a small aperture. The aperture governs how much light
the telescope collects – and the more light it collects, the more you can
see. Hence it is best to get the largest aperture telescope you can afford,
whether a refractor or reflector.
 |
A
typical small refractor on a simple stand, with a star diagonal at the
eyepiece end.
All
diagrams by John Lewis
|
The
smallest telescopes, i.e. those with apertures under 75 mm or 3 inches,
are always refractors. Telescopes with larger apertures are usually reflectors,
since large mirrors can be made more cheaply than lenses.
The
smallest refractors, of 50 or 60 mm (2 or 2.4 inches) aperture, will show
the Moon's craters and dark lowland "seas" (the maria), Saturn's rings,
Jupiter's cloud belts and its four main satellites, some attractive double
stars, and various nebulae and galaxies. Small or medium-sized reflectors
have apertures of 100 mm (4 inches) or larger. They will usually show fainter
objects and finer details than small refractors.
Although
a small refractor may appear a good first buy, there is one very important
warning. Many low-budget refractors are either poorly made or make misleading
claims as to their performance. In the worst cases the telescopes may be
useless for astronomy, even though their finish may be apparently good.
Unfortunately, even some leading stores sell telescopes which are of very
poor optical quality.
One
of the main failings of simple lenses is that they produce fringes of false
colour around objects, an effect known as chromatic aberration. A lens
which is corrected for such false colour is termed achromatic so it is
worth looking for this in the description, although it still does not guarantee
good performance. Mirrors do not suffer from chromatic aberration.
What
to look for
back
to top of page
If
possible, make the following checks before buying a small refractor:
*
Look down the tube through the main lens. Is there a stop – a disc with
a small hole in it – a short way down the tube? (This should not be confused
with light baffles, which are a series of rings of decreasing diameter
positioned at intervals down the tube.) Such a stop is an attempt to sharpen
the image, like using a small f-stop on a camera. Unfortunately, it drastically
reduces the effective aperture, and hence the image brightness. Telescopes
of this sort will show you virtually nothing that you cannot see with the
naked eye. If they claim to use the full size of the lens, they are being
fraudulently advertised.
*
Observe the Moon at night. Its edge should be sharp and free from obvious
false colour. Make sure you observe outside, and not through a window,
closed or open.
If
the telescope fails either of these tests, do not buy it or return it for
a full refund.
Magnification
back
to top of page
The
magnification of a telescope depends on the eyepiece used. Telescopes usually
come with a selection of eyepieces that offer low, medium and high powers.
Do not get carried away by advertisements for small telescopes that claim
magnifications of many hundreds of times. Too high a magnification will
show less rather than more, since an over-magnified image will be faint
and indistinct.
A
good rule of thumb is a magnification of twice the aperture in millimetres
(or 50 times for each inch of aperture – see Telescope Performance table
below). Of course, if the telescope's aperture is stopped down, the maximum
usable magnification is correspondingly reduced.
The
atmosphere itself places a limit on the highest magnification you can use,
because air currents make the images of stars and planets unsteady, an
effect known as seeing. No matter how large a telescope you own, from a
normal ground-level site the maximum usable magnification will be about
300. Beyond this, an eyepiece just magnifies the distorting effect of the
atmosphere, creating a useless "boiling" image.
Telescopes,
like cameras, have f-numbers. The focal length of a telescope is the length
of the light path from the main lens or mirror to the eyepiece. The focal
ratio (or f/ratio) of a telescope is its focal length divided by its aperture.
For example, a telescope of 100 mm aperture with an 800-mm focal length
is an f/8 instrument.
Focal
length is not a critical consideration, but it does determine what objects
an instrument is best suited for observing. For example, f/4 to f/6 telescopes
are preferred by people who like to observe deep-sky objects such as nebulae
and galaxies. However, others who like to view the Moon and planets opt
for f/7 and above.
Telescope
performance |
Aperture |
Faintest
star |
Highest
usable power |
(inches) |
(mm) |
(magnitude) |
|
2.4 |
60 |
11.6 |
120 |
3.1 |
80 |
12.2 |
160 |
4.0 |
100 |
12.7 |
200 |
6.0 |
150 |
13.6 |
300 |
Mountings
back
to top of page
The simplest
type of mounting, used by small refractors, is the altazimuth design. This
requires you to move the instrument simultaneously about both axes (the
altitude and azimuth) to keep an object in the field of view.
 |
A small
reflecting telescope on an equatorial mount.
|
Larger telescopes
incorporate an equatorial mount, which needs to be set up more carefully
with the polar axis pointing to the north celestial pole, near Polaris.
An equatorial mount is more expensive but has the advantage that objects
can be kept within the field of view as the Earth rotates by turning the
telescope around the poleward-pointing axis only.
In recent years
the Dobsonian mount has become increasingly popular as a low-cost, portable
alternative to equatorials. It incorporates a modified altazimuth design,
and is best suited to reflectors used with low-power eyepieces for wide-angle
viewing of the sky, in which precise tracking is not essential.
Department store
and mail-order-catalogue refractors often employ notoriously unstable and
clumsy desktop tripod mountings. There is no point in buying a telescope
with a shaky mounting, as you will be unable to see anything properly,
particularly when the wind blows. Also, remember that comfort and ease
of use are vital. You will not enjoy using a telescope if you have to kneel
down and crane your neck to look through it.
Most small refractors
have so-called slow motions, which are gears, often with flexible cables,
linked to the axes. They allow you to follow objects by turning knobs.
Beware of stiff slow motions which are more trouble than they are worth.
The more expensive mounts have motor drives, which track an object without
any effort. These are particularly useful when observing planets.
Eyepieces
back
to top of page
Eyepieces are
the most important accessory you will buy. Regardless of how good a telescope's
lens or mirror may be, its performance will be seriously degraded if the
eyepieces are of poor optical quality.
Eyepieces are
interchangeable, and provide different magnifying powers, determined by
their focal length. They are marked with numbers, such as 25 mm, which
indicate their focal length. The longer the focal length, the lower the
magnification but (generally) the larger the field of view. Lower powers
are best for observing faint, diffuse objects such as comets, nebulae and
galaxies, while higher powers are best for the Moon, planets and double
stars.
The magnifying
power of an eyepiece can be found by dividing its focal length into the
focal length of the telescope. Hence a given eyepiece will provide higher
magnification on a telescope of long focal length than one of short focal
length.
The cheapest
acceptable eyepiece for amateurs is the Kellner design. It offers a useful
field of view, spanning up to 45°. The designs known as the Erfle and
the orthoscopic are more expensive alternatives, offering better optical
performance.
People looking
through an astronomical telescope for the first time are usually surprised
to find that the image is upside down. This is a basic characteristic of
a telescope, and for daytime use it is corrected by using extra lenses
or what is termed an erecting prism. It makes little difference which way
up an astronomical body appears, so astronomers usually accept the basic
upside-down view.
Some small refractors
are provided with a star diagonal (an encased prism) to turn the image
the right way up, but left and right are reversed. Bear this in mind when
looking at the Moon and planets.
Don't blame
your eyepieces for a poor image if your telescope is simply pointing out
of a window; the difference in air temperature inside the room and outside
causes turbulence which distorts the starlight.
Finders
back
to top of page
A telescope
should have a smaller finderscope attached to its main tube. This is a
low-magnification telescope used for aiming the main instrument. A typical
finder has a magnification of 6 and an aperture of 30 mm, described as
6 x 30. The cheaper instruments often have 5 x 24 finders, which invariably
have stops in them restricting the working aperture to about 10 mm. They
will help locate the brightest objects, but little else.
Check your
telescope
back
to top of page
There are a
number of simple tests you can perform on equipment to test its quality.
Tap the tube lightly. The image should take no more than three to five
seconds to stop shaking. Some people hang a weight from the centre of the
tripod to improve its stability and to damp down vibrations.
The only easy
test for optical quality is to observe a star image after allowing the
telescope to reach outside temperature, which may take an hour, and on
a night when the seeing is excellent.
Using the maximum
usable power (see Telescope Performance table above), examine the image
of a moderately bright star. When perfectly focused it should be a point
or very small disc of light surrounded by faint rings. In poor seeing this
appearance may be hard to achieve with even a good telescope.
Defocus the
image on both sides of the focus point. In both cases it should become
an evenly illuminated and circular disc, although in the case of a reflector
you will see the shadow of the secondary mirror in the middle. If it is
impossible to achieve perfect focus, and the image appears as a short line
on either side of focus, the telescope is suffering from the optical defect
called astigmatism.
Cost
back
to top of page
So what's all
this going to cost you? A decent pair of 8 x 40 binoculars can be purchased
for £50. A reasonable 80-mm refractor will set you back about £150,
while a 4-inch reflector can cost as little as £250. Remember that
a telescope is a precision optical instrument and so you should be prepared
to pay as much as for a good camera.
Legal issues
back
to top of page
If you use a
credit card to purchase equipment worth £100 or more, on which the
workmanship is shoddy or the goods are damaged in the post, you will have
redress to the law through the Consumer Credit Act, 1974. Try to resolve
the matter with the retailer, but if that fails write to both your local
Consumers' Association office and your credit card company.
If you feel
you have been misled in any way, or that the specification of the telescope
has been falsely described, you should complain to your local trading standards
office. Indeed, it is your duty to do so.
Binoculars
– a good first choice
back
to top of page
 |
Binoculars
contain prisms that fold the light path, thereby making them more compact
than telescopes.
|
THERE are many
beautiful sights, such as the star fields of the Milky Way, star clusters
such as the Pleiades and Hyades, and ghostly comets, which can only be
truly appreciated in low-power, wide-field binoculars. These compact, simple
devices are the ultimate in portable, easy-to-use equipment, and many observers
use them to complement their telescopic observations.
Binoculars are
usually marked with figures such as 8 x 40, 7 x 50, or 10 x 50. The first
figure is the magnification, and the second is the aperture of the front
lenses in millimetres. For general observing, 7 x 50 or 10 x 50 binoculars
are equally useful. If you find the weight of 50-mm binoculars a problem,
go for 40-mm or even 30-mm models.
Avoid binoculars
with magnifications greater than 12, which will be difficult to hold steady,
unless you have a particular need for a specialist pair. Zoom binoculars
should be avoided, too, as they generally have narrow fields of view and
poor optics. Good binoculars will have coloured coatings on the optics,
similar to non-reflective coatings on spectacles, which improve the image
brightness by increasing transmission of light.
Some cheap mail-order
binoculars economise by using prisms that are too small, which severely
limit the field of view. Look into the front lens – you should see a small
circle of light through them. If the circle is cut off or square, you are
losing light. Also be aware that very cheap models may have spurious bulges
in the barrels to give the impression that they contain prisms when they
do not. Such instruments are simply opera glasses with a straight-through
optical system, having a very restricted magnification and field of view.
And the best
telescope is...
back
to top of page
So what is the
best telescope for you? The simple answer is: it's the one that you think
you'll use the most often. Ease of set-up, simplicity of use and portability
should be key factors in your decision. Move up to larger equipment only
when you have proved to yourself that you can get out to observe on a regular
basis. Also, make contact with your local astronomical society who will
be able to give you advice on equipment and its use. Their address should
be available from your local library.
A
safety warning
back
to top of page
Many
telescopes are supplied with eyepiece filters. They soften the glare of
the Moon, Sun and the brighter planets. Unfortunately, they are often of
low quality, and the solar filters in particular can be extremely dangerous.
They can easily crack under the focused heat of the Sun, and should be
avoided. Remember, it only takes a fraction of a second of unfiltered sunlight
to cause permanent blindness. The only safe way to observe the Sun is to
project its image onto a white card. Never observe it through the main
telescope or the finder, even if it has a filter.
Original text
by Steve Tidey of the Association for Astronomy Education.
© National
Astronomy Week and AAE. This information may by copied freely for non-commercial
purposes.
|